When we spoke about Alice Wolf Gilborn during class we
talked a lot about how confused she must be because of sentences like, “If I
didn’t exist, I could live happily in the Adirondacks without ever having to
challenge nature in order to prove myself.” (91) Statements like these seem to
make almost no sense. How can you not exist and still live in a place, much
less live happily there?
But consider the context of this
sentence. The paragraph above the one in which she makes this seemingly
ridiculous statement is all about how small and insignificant she is. “If the
sun was just a pinprick of light in the scheme of things, then the earth was
microscopic and I was infinitesimal. Zero, in fact.” (91) Later, she goes on to
talk about how big she is in comparison to an ant, how powerful. Throughout the
entry she plays with the idea of size and importance.
I’m not sure that there are any
coincidences out there. But I have learned very quickly, and over and over
again, that contradictions are all around. They are the one consistency I have
found in life. They are the reason so many things make no sense at all. Maybe
this is the exact idea that Alice Gilborn runs into while writing this passage.
How can she be so big to an ant and yet mean nothing in the scheme of the
universe? If this is true, can’t she also not exist and live happily? And don’t
hermits (the ones who live alone and don’t become famous because of what the
write while outside of society) live without existing?
No comments:
Post a Comment