“It’s dangerous to love things that aren’t alive.”
This
line from Jeanne Robert Foster’s Sabeal refers
to the lumberman’s desperate desire for gold and his resulting destruction. He
murders the Indian trapper in order to get his hands on it, but what I find
most intriguing about this idea is that I can think of more examples supporting
the opposite. While addiction of any material item can consume a person's life, I think love for the fleeting can feel just as dangerous. Things that aren’t living seem more likely to be constant, since mortality doesn't factor in.
My
opinion is, of course, colored by my recent trip to Seattle; I couldn’t
help but notice how permanent the buildings, sidewalks, waterways, and
mountains seemed in comparison to the life of my friend
Javier, who might only have a matter of weeks. I think what makes loving a living thing so terrifying is the
constant possibility that it will disappear. I understand Foster’s warning
against greed and its inevitable result of ruin, but I wonder if “dangerous”
in this sense might overlook the emotional danger of attachment. After
all, the lumberman was driven to kill and steal by the thought of losing the
love of his life.
Javier and I posing with a coconut.
Beautiful post, Meals
ReplyDelete