To demand someone have a
transcendental experience seems inherently ironic and misguided: an assignment
requiring one to conform to the expectations, conventions, and demands produced
by others, rather than experiencing a place on one’s own accord.
I include my 9th grade writing
not out of bitter contempt towards the teacher whose sole comments were that I
failed to follow the prompt, but rather, because I find it strikingly similar
to my current struggle to connect Thoreau’s theory and writing into my own
practice. I continue to grapple with what it means “to live deliberately” and
“front only the essential facts of life,” uncertain whether some attainable
authenticity exists, and to what degree in practice I can separate myself from
my own cultural foundations that shape the lens through which I view even the
most natural isolated spaces. Is it problematic that I often crave the trivial
routines that Thoreau so vehemently disdains - am I a slave capitulating to
industrial capitalist culture for feeling at home in the chaos of the city?
In my 9th grade passage I
express my frustration in feeling unable to escape the cultural gaze through
which I viewed the place of Walden pond, hindered by what felt like invasions
of culture in a space I then romanticized to be a pure paragon of nature. As my
senior fall semester progresses, I am ceaselessly mesmerized by the panoramic
high peak tableau outside my window, eager to understand how this dichotomy of
nature and culture (which I don’t believe to be as starkly black and white as
Thoreau) continues to influence my perception of and experience in this place.
What felt unattainable when forced to produce meaning I now venture to explore
deliberately on my own.
Below is verbatim a written assignment of mine from 9th
grade in response to the prompt “Describe a transcendental experience at Walden
Pond.”
(It is ridden with high school angst)
Rachael Wilkin
Transcendental Experience, Walden Pond 2009
Between the crowds of students blasting music on their
static filled iPod speakers, the thick wire fence that lined the pathway we
were told strictly not to veer off of, and, perhaps the most disturbing, the
pieces of trash that scattered on the edges of the trail, Walden certainty did
not live up to my romanticized expectations. It seemed that which Thoreau
explicitly escaped from was present throughout my experience of the place. Despite
seeking a solitary moment of contemplation, I was bombarded by distractions of
the industrialized city from which I had come.
The foliage was breathtaking, certainly, and was a refreshingly different view from my apartment window. But the pond surprisingly appeared invasively affected by contemporary urban influences. Along the trail, the fence along the path manifested as a physical obstacle, restricting visitors form making their own connection to nature, the opposite of what Thoreau sought by coming to Walden. Although the reflection of the trees on the crystal clear water and the vivid colors of the leaves were truly unforgettable, the image of the wired railing cutting this idyllic picture in half remains most prevalent in my mind.
And perhaps the pedestal I had put Walden pond on was
so enormously romanticized that the contemporary reality of it was impossible
to compare to that which was experienced and made meaningful by Thoreau. When
the opportunity to observe it in a comparable manner was proposed, the feelings
I had while walking around the place lacked the meaningful conclusions I felt
required to produce: how does one comprehend the bigness and meaning of nature
and the fundamental facts of life in 30 minutes? I so desperately wanted to have an
epiphany about how human beings should be more like beans – perhaps I couldn’t
find meaning fast enough, or perhaps the pressure itself of coming to a
meaningful conclusion about the place was enough to distract me from paying
attention to what might have been authentically experienced.
Instead of focusing on the magnificence of the pond, the trash and fence-restricted pathways made me think about
how places constantly transform: that even a place so incredible as Walden Pond
has been corrupted by modern day influences like garbage, and even people -
people who were so inconsiderate of the atmosphere around them that instead of
admiring the beautiful scenery, they opted to blast music and talk so loudly
that they invaded and seemed to disturb not only there experience of others,
but the essence of Walden pond itself.
I am so glad you posted your old assignment. It's interesting that you are feeling similarly now.
ReplyDeleteYour teacher must have been having a very bad day. That's pretty amazing writing and thinking for a grade 9 student, I would say. And it's transcendental in drawing larger truths out of a specific experience, certainly!
ReplyDeleteI actually love what you wrote in 9th grade! I agree with Onno that if I were your teacher, I would be impressed. Perhaps if you had spent more time there (perhaps 26 months as Thoreau did :p), you might have found some authentic meaning, but obviously with music blaring and fences obstructing and interrupting your view, any transcendental experience that kids would have written about would likely have been feigned. If your teacher had asked the students to find personal meaning in the harmony between modern distractions and intrusions that were not present during Thoreau's time, maybe you or someone would have had a deeper, transcendental experience. I do not think that transcendental experiences can only happen in nature free of industrial qualities, but the way the teacher probably framed the assignment as relative to Thoreau's writing made it seem as if such were impossible, and he or she completely denied the existence of modern practices in the scene of Walden Pond that you engaged with.
ReplyDelete